There's a couple of lovely Jane Austen-esque dresses, which as well as being beautiful are also simple and elegant, and look comfy to wear. Alas, this is soon subsumed in the high Victorian era of too much everything, swiftly followed by these ultra-fashionable late Victorian pieces which are just ouch. Fortunately World War one comes along and women are soon able to breathe again, in a variety of elegant and comfy drop-waisters which are also wonderfully tasteful.
Sadly the whole 'less is more' ethos of the inter-war years goes missing again in the 1950s, and while there's a couple of lovely 1950's lace frocks (including one owned by Princess Margaret, designed by Norman Hartnell) there's also a couple of horrors. Layers of tangerine lace do not for elegance make. The modern items in the exhibit are probably the least interesting, though I did swoon over a lovely, lovely pink and green dress by Alberta Ferretti.
If there's one thing
I'd have liked some more of it's the background information about the
lace and how it's made. I was curious about the huge handmade lace
efforts of the Victorian era – it's easy to know about the kind of
women that wore them, but what about the women that made them? Were
they skilled, well-paid artisans, or slaving away in a factory? The
dresses are amazing but I felt they were slightly bereft of stories –
like this beautiful dress, knitted by a lady's grandmother in the
1930s as a wedding dress, eventually used for the wedding in 1946.
What happened? Was the 1946 wedding to the man she was planning to
marry in the 1930s, or someone else entirely? And what happened in
between? And there's the lovely flapper dress, made in France, worn
by an Indian Rani – who was she, and what happened to her? Clothes are an intimate
part of women's lives, and as such if you're interested in women's
history then any history of fashion is always fascinating. But I'd
have appreciated a little more about the lives behind the fashion, as
well.
Admission to Lace in Fashion is included in the museum entry price.
No comments:
Post a Comment